NATO members mount huge resupply operation

(Mathew Luxmoore, The Wall Street Journal, 8 March 2022)President Zelensky has complained bitterly about the failure of NATO to enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine. This was a non-starter for the very good reason that it would likely result in US and Russia aircraft shooting at each other, with potentially catastrophic consequences. However in lieu of that the NATO nations have mounted an effort with few historical precedents to arm the Ukrainian forces.

This has included sophisticated anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons, including some of the best in the US and European inventories, like the Javelin and NLAW anti-tank missiles and the Stinger anti-aircraft missile. These have allowed the Ukrainians to inflict heavy losses on the Russians and prevent them occupying all but one or two of the major cities.

This effort has been joined by states that hitherto were either explicitly neutral (Sweden, Switzerland, Finland) or that had decided for historical reasons to refrain from supplying weapons to overseas conflicts (Germany). According to this article, the Czech republic alone sent 10,000 rocket-propelled grenades in a single week.

Excerpts   Read the article   Discuss the article   View in graph

In the space of two weeks, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has set off one of the largest and fastest arms transfers in history.

By road and rail, the Czech Republic sent 10,000 rocket-propelled grenades to Ukraine’s defenders last week alone. In Poland, the provincial airport of Rzeszow located about 60 miles from the Ukrainian border has been so crowded with military cargo jets that on Saturday some flights were briefly diverted until airfield space became available.

On the country’s highways, police vehicles are escorting military transport trucks to the border, with other convoys slipping into Ukraine via snow-covered back roads through the mountains.

The race to deliver arms to Ukraine is emerging as a supply operation with few historical parallels. Western allies, having ruled out putting troops on the ground in Ukraine, have been attempting to equip the country’s thinly spread and outmatched military, some of its soldiers fighting without boots.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Readings
NATO members mount huge resupply operation
Why Putin is beholden to Stalin's legacy
Russia's surprising military blunders in Ukraine
Why John Mearsheimer blames the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine
A lesson in energy masochism
Regathering of the Russian lands
Vladimir Putin's clash of civilizations
Germany, in historic reversal, abandons pro-Putin Russia policy
The Russian spy boss humiliated by Putin
War propaganda becoming more militaristic, authoritarian and reckless
What's on Putin's mind?
NATO enlargement and Russia: Die-hard myths and real dilemmas
Can Russia actually control Ukraine?
China's Ukraine crisis
Do race academics matter?
How China captured Hollywood
Putin's spiritual destiny
Introducing Race Marxism
The West is sleepwalking into war in Ukraine
Are we closer to Bradbury's dystopia than Orwell's or Huxley's?
Stunning new evidence re Trump spying allegations
Would permanently excluding Ukraine from NATO have satisfied Russia?
How Russia hooked Europe on its oil and gas
Why "anti-racism" should be resisted
Free speech in the UK?
Taking the low road: China's influence in Aust states and territories
The neoliberal war on dissent in the West
Fusion power is coming
The Silencing: a special report on China and the Uyghurs
Is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez an insider now?
A life that doesn't matter
America's asymmetric civil war
Anomalies in the Chinese Covid data
Australia's surprising Covid excess death count
Biden's budget priorities and the China threat
Big help with a little badmouth
Cancelled New York Times journalist's anti-woke manifesto
China: Friend or Foe? Oxford Union debate
China's sway over Australian universities
Covid and Big Pharma: The debate about cheap generic drugs
CRT in schools— Virginia puts NSW to shame
Data scientist fired from Reuters for questioning BLM
Does the CCP control Extinction Rebellion?
Facebook versus the BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong
Gallant little Lithuania
How Britain became Putin's playground
How feminism ate itself
How our universities became sheep factories
How to deal with the "seditionists"
If you hate the culture wars, blame liberals
Imperial College London cancels Thomas Huxley
Intel's groveling China apology
Johns Hopkins analysis disputes the effectiveness of lockdowns
Killing the Wuhan lab leak theory
Meritocracy's cost
New study says lockdowns don't work. Fact or fiction?
Proposed new terrorism law would exclude jihadists
Reuters: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was co-ordinated
Should race matter when choosing Supreme Court justices?
The CCP and the problem of "elite capture"
The dispensable Mrs Merkel
The end of progressive America?
The failure of "Latinx"
The foolishness of "ugly freedoms"
The Ghost of Jim Crow
The green threat to effective climate policy
The histrionics and melodrama around 1/6
The Law of Group Polarization
The liberal fantasy of the Capitol coup
The Marxist who antagonizes liberals and the Left
Victims of the unvaccinated
Welcome to the end of democracy
What if democracy and climate mitigation are incompatible?
What the Right gets wrong about Ukraine...
White supremacy: The identarian Left's Theory of Everything
Why did scientists suppress the lab-leak theory?
Why is the Right so unattractive?
Yes, there is a counter revolution
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip