Stunning new evidence re Trump spying allegations

(Jerry Dunleavy, Washington Examiner, 12 February 2022)If you followed the Muller investigation into allegations of collusion between Donald Trump and Russia that dominated American politics for three years you would be aware of Trump claiming that he had been spied on during the 2016 campaign and after. These allegations were routinely ridiculed and censored by the mainstream media and social media. Recent revelations provide confirmation that Trump was right about this.

The conduct of the FBI and the Department of Justice during the Muller probe was the subject of a major investigation by the Inspector-General of the DOJ, Michael Horowitz. His report, released in December 2019, was a devastating indictment of the conduct of these agencies. Of most concern was the obtaining of FISA warrants to carry out surveillance of Trump campaign figures, which relied on the so-called Steele dossier, which the FBI knew to be baseless after they interviewed the principle source in January 2017.

Before leaving office, the Attorney-General in the Trump administration Bill Barr appointed a Special Counsel to investigate this conduct, John Durham. To the frustration of Trump, this investigation yielded very little in the way of results by the time of the 2020 election.

However since then things have started to come to a head, with the issuing of a number of indictments of people closely involved with the Clinton campaign. The most recent (12 February) court filing by Durham contains stunning allegations of the enlisting by figures close to Clinton, including her chief legal adviser, of an information technology company to carry out surveillance not just of the campaign but even the Executive Office after Trump was sworn in as President.

Excerpts   Read the article   Discuss the article   View in graph

Special counsel John Durham says he is building a case to show the technology executive with whom an indicted Democratic lawyer on the payroll of Hillary Clinton's campaign was working to build a Trump-Russia collusion narrative gained access to internet traffic at the White House to try and obtain dirt on former President Donald Trump.

Left-wing lawyer Michael Sussmann was indicted last year for allegedly concealing his clients, among them Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, from the FBI when he volunteered since-debunked claims of a secret back channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank. Durham revealed in a Friday court filing that he has evidence that Sussmann’s other client (dubbed “Technology Executive-1” but known to be former Neustar Senior Vice President Rodney Joffe) “exploited” domain name system internet traffic at “a particular health care provider” (which was likely Spectrum Health), Trump Tower, Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and “the Executive Office of the President of the United States.”

The revelations, made as part of a motion for the Washington, D.C., federal court to look into possible conflicts of interest related to Sussmann’s defense team, gave allies of Trump more reason to believe the former president was spied upon, as evidenced by an upsurge in tweets about the latest salve in the so-called Russiagate scandal.

"They didn’t just spy on Donald Trump’s campaign. They spied on Donald Trump as sitting President of the United States. It was all even worse than we thought," tweeted Mark Meadows, a former congressman who later became Trump's White House chief of staff.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Readings
Stunning new evidence re Trump spying allegations
Why Putin is beholden to Stalin's legacy
Russia's surprising military blunders in Ukraine
Why John Mearsheimer blames the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine
A lesson in energy masochism
NATO members mount huge resupply operation
Regathering of the Russian lands
Vladimir Putin's clash of civilizations
Germany, in historic reversal, abandons pro-Putin Russia policy
The Russian spy boss humiliated by Putin
War propaganda becoming more militaristic, authoritarian and reckless
What's on Putin's mind?
NATO enlargement and Russia: Die-hard myths and real dilemmas
Can Russia actually control Ukraine?
China's Ukraine crisis
Do race academics matter?
How China captured Hollywood
Putin's spiritual destiny
Introducing Race Marxism
The West is sleepwalking into war in Ukraine
Are we closer to Bradbury's dystopia than Orwell's or Huxley's?
Would permanently excluding Ukraine from NATO have satisfied Russia?
How Russia hooked Europe on its oil and gas
Why "anti-racism" should be resisted
Free speech in the UK?
Taking the low road: China's influence in Aust states and territories
The neoliberal war on dissent in the West
Fusion power is coming
The Silencing: a special report on China and the Uyghurs
Is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez an insider now?
A life that doesn't matter
America's asymmetric civil war
Anomalies in the Chinese Covid data
Australia's surprising Covid excess death count
Biden's budget priorities and the China threat
Big help with a little badmouth
Cancelled New York Times journalist's anti-woke manifesto
China: Friend or Foe? Oxford Union debate
China's sway over Australian universities
Covid and Big Pharma: The debate about cheap generic drugs
CRT in schools— Virginia puts NSW to shame
Data scientist fired from Reuters for questioning BLM
Does the CCP control Extinction Rebellion?
Facebook versus the BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong
Gallant little Lithuania
How Britain became Putin's playground
How feminism ate itself
How our universities became sheep factories
How to deal with the "seditionists"
If you hate the culture wars, blame liberals
Imperial College London cancels Thomas Huxley
Intel's groveling China apology
Johns Hopkins analysis disputes the effectiveness of lockdowns
Killing the Wuhan lab leak theory
Meritocracy's cost
New study says lockdowns don't work. Fact or fiction?
Proposed new terrorism law would exclude jihadists
Reuters: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was co-ordinated
Should race matter when choosing Supreme Court justices?
The CCP and the problem of "elite capture"
The dispensable Mrs Merkel
The end of progressive America?
The failure of "Latinx"
The foolishness of "ugly freedoms"
The Ghost of Jim Crow
The green threat to effective climate policy
The histrionics and melodrama around 1/6
The Law of Group Polarization
The liberal fantasy of the Capitol coup
The Marxist who antagonizes liberals and the Left
Victims of the unvaccinated
Welcome to the end of democracy
What if democracy and climate mitigation are incompatible?
What the Right gets wrong about Ukraine...
White supremacy: The identarian Left's Theory of Everything
Why did scientists suppress the lab-leak theory?
Why is the Right so unattractive?
Yes, there is a counter revolution
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip